The tables compare the predicted and actual immigration
figures for the UK for 17 year-period from 1984 to 2000. It is obviously appeared
that the prediction made did not meet the actual events.
Looking at the details, it can be seen that the actual figures
were either more or less than different from the predicted figures except in 1989 as the actual figure met the prediction at 80 thousand.
In contrary, there were 6 certain
years where the actual figures were less than the predicted of which they were
less by 2 to 6 as in 1986, 1987, 1992, 1993 or 15-16 as in 1996 and 1997. the actual immigration figures had
rapid fluctuations from 58,000 in 1984
to 114,000 in 1995. However, after that the figures increased gradually from
102,000 in 1996 to 163,000 in 2000.
All in all, we can conclude that, the
predictions were inaccurate as the actual figure were more about 15-25 or 2-7
and they were less by 2-6. there were difference between the predicted and actual
immigration figures throughout the period.
|
Evaluation
Report
|
Word count
|
174
|
Comments
|
The candidate
has presented a general overview of the graphs. The key features have been
identified and illustrated, but the details are not properly mentioned.
Paragraphing of the report is fine. However, there are some mistakes related
to grammar and sentence structures. Overall, the report can be improved
further.
|
Estimated Band Score
|
5.5
|
Suggestions
|
1. Revise
grammar and improve sentence structures.
2. Observe
the graph carefully and respond accordingly.
3. Always
proofread the task response after finishing it.
Keep practicing to improve your performance.
Writing Correction Service - to order a
correction click here
|
No comments:
Post a Comment