The chart
shows the difference in prices of water consumption rates in five cities in
2000 and 2010 compared to that of the year 1990. Overall, it can be seen that
all the cities noted expensive higher water rates than that of 1990’ except in Osaka and
in San Francisco (but only in the year 2000).
The most
striking features is noted in San Francisco, its water rate prices price was 2% less than that of 1990’ in 2000 and
significantly rose to 5% by 5% more than that of 1990’ in 2010. Other
The other point to note is in Osaka, which was
the only country that had cheaper prices than that of 1990’ over the period.
Surprisingly, in 2000, its figure was 5% less, then in 2010 it .
It decreased even more to by 7% less than that of 1990’
compared to the price of water in 1990.
The rest of
the cities, however, saw an
increase higher prices from
2000 to 2010 than that of 1990’. The highest increase was marked in Delhi from 4.5% in
2000 to 7.9% in 2010 than
that of 1990’. The figures for Seville and Shanghai also experienced
the same, they increased increasing from 2.5% to 4.5% and from 3% to 4% than that of 1990’
respectively.
|
|
Evaluation
Report
|
|
Word count
|
196
|
|
Comments
|
The
candidate has presented a general overview of the bar chart. An effort to
compare and contrast the main features is visible. Paragraphing of the report
is fine. However, there are some mistakes related to grammar and sentence
structure. In addition, choice of words is inappropriate at some places.
Overall, the report needs further improvements.
|
|
Estimated Band Score
|
6.0
|
|
Suggestions
|
1. Pay
more attention to grammar and improve sentences.
2. Need
to improve choice of words.
3. Avoid
repetition of words.
4. Keep
practicing to improve your performance.
5. Writing
Correction Service - to order a correction click here
|
No comments:
Post a Comment